In Rust, the Core i7-920 is slightly slower than the Core i5-10600KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $71 cheaper!
Core i7-920
- Up to 47% cheaper – $78.36 vs $149.00
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 41% better value in Rust – $0.37 vs $0.63/FPS
- Up to 41% better value in Rust
Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 12% faster in Rust – 234 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Rust
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 27% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Core i5-10600KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
209 FPS
89%
Min 1% FPS
40 FPS
67%
Price, $
$78.36
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149
52%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
59%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i5-10600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i5-10600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 130 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
