The Core i7-920 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-6300 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $20.70 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-920
- Up to 19% cheaper – $88.00 vs $108.70
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i3-6300
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 51 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-920 cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-920 vs Core i3-6300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
183
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$108.7
80%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
90%
Core i7-920 vs Core i3-6300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Core i3-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Core i3-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.67 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
2.93 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-6300
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-920 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
130 W | Power Consumption | 51 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2133 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |