In Control, the Core i7-920 is same performance as the Celeron G3930. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $64 more expensive!
Core i7-920
No clear advantages
Celeron G3930
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Nov 17, 2008
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
- Up to 69% cheaper – $29.00 vs $92.84
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Control – $0.11 vs $0.37/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 51 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-920 vs Celeron G3930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$92.84
31%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
30%
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-920 vs Celeron G3930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-920 vs Celeron G3930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-920
Nov 17th, 2008
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-920 Nov 17th, 2008 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 130W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 610 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
