In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-8809G is slightly slower than the Xeon X3440. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-8809G
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Feb 01, 2018 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3440
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 206 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-8809G vs Xeon X3440: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8809G vs Xeon X3440 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8809G vs Xeon X3440 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8809G
Feb 1st, 2018
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3440
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8809G Feb 1st, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3440 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 1st, 2018 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $215.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | LGA1156 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Radeon RX Vega M GH | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
