The Core i7-875K is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-4820K and it's also a worse value for money, as it's only $25.86 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-875K
- Up to 13% cheaper – $174.02 vs $199.88
- Consumes up to 27% less energy – 95 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-4820K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i7-875K vs Core i7-4820K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
168
98%
Min 1% FPS
113
98%
Price, $
$174.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, $
$199.88
87%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
89%
Core i7-875K vs Core i7-4820K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-875K vs Core i7-4820K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-875K vs Core i7-4820K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
92%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i7-4820K
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-875K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-4820K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| $353.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Ivy Bridge E |
95 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 10 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
