Core i7-875K vs Core i5-13400F in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i7-875K is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-13400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only $91.86 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i7-875K
- Up to 51% cheaper – $89.99 vs $181.85
Advantages of the Core i5-13400F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
182
81%
Min 1% FPS
126
83%
Price, $
$89.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
224
100%
Min 1% FPS
152
100%
Price, $
$181.85
49%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-875K vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-875K vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.933 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-875K | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $353.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
