Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4602 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Core i7-875K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $174.02 vs $899.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-13400F - $0.83 vs $3.35 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 29% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-875K - 269 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
209
78%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$174.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $174.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.35/FPS
25%
Price, $
$899.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-875K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |