The Core i7-875K is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $83.93 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-875K
The Core i3-14100F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i3-14100F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 48% cheaper – $90.09 vs $174.02
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-875K vs Core i3-14100F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
168
81%
Min 1% FPS
113
82%
Price, $
$174.02
51%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
42%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
208
100%
Min 1% FPS
137
100%
Price, $
$90.09
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Core i7-875K vs Core i3-14100F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-875K vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-875K vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
28%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-875K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$353.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 12 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |