In Control, the Core i7-8700T is slightly faster than the Xeon E5649. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 7 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5649
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Xeon E5649: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Xeon E5649 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Xeon E5649 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
