In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i7-8700T is slightly faster than the Ryzen Embedded R1606G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 11% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 121 vs 109 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Callisto Protocol
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer – Feb 25, 2020 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 25 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
121 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.27/FPS
100%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Feb 25th, 2020
Average FPS
109 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
77 FPS
89%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Feb 25th, 2020
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
88%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
90%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Embedded R1606G Feb 25th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Feb 25th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | FP5 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 25 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
