In Atomfall, the Core i7-8700T is slightly faster than the FX-6350. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $224 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
FX-6350
- Up to 81% cheaper – $51.29 vs $275.00
- Up to 81% cheaper
- Up to 80% better value in Atomfall – $0.27 vs $1.32/FPS
- Up to 80% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs FX-6350: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
18%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
20%
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
188 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
90%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs FX-6350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs FX-6350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
35W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
