In Rust, the Core i7-8700T is slower than the Core Ultra 5 235 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $1 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 5 235
- Up to 22% faster in Rust – 275 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 22% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Up to 0% cheaper – $273.98 vs $275.00
- Up to 0% cheaper
- Up to 18% better value in Rust – $0.99 vs $1.21/FPS
- Up to 18% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 5 235: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
226 FPS
82%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
61%
Price, $
$275
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
82%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
275 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
100%
Price, $
$273.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 5 235 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core Ultra 5 235 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
80%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 5 235
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 5 235 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $257.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 24EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
