In Atomfall, the Core i7-8700T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4960HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 204 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 26% less energy – 35 vs 47 Watts
- Consumes up to 26% less energy
Core i7-4960HQ
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i7-4960HQ: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i7-4960HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i7-4960HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-4960HQ
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4960HQ Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 47 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 5200 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
