In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-8700T is slightly faster than the Core i5-11600K. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $76 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-11600K
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 28% cheaper – $199.00 vs $275.00
- Up to 28% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $1.17 vs $1.57/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-11600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
72%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
75%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
169 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
97%
Price, $
$199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-11600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-11600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
82%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Core i5-11600K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $262.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
