In Rust, the Core i7-8700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-10600K and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $91 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 234 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer
- Up to 33% cheaper – $183.99 vs $275.00
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 36% better value in Rust – $0.78 vs $1.21/FPS
- Up to 36% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10600K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
226 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
90%
Price, $
$275
66%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
64%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$183.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10600K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
