In Atomfall, the Core i7-8700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-10500 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $45 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-10500
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer
- Up to 16% cheaper – $229.95 vs $275.00
- Up to 16% cheaper
- Up to 18% better value in Atomfall – $1.07 vs $1.31/FPS
- Up to 18% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10500: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
98%
Price, $
$275
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
82%
Core i5-10500
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10500 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10500 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
89%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10500
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10500 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
