In F1 24, the Core i7-8700T is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 3% faster in F1 24 – 159 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in F1 24
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 28 days newer
F1 24 FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
155 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
116 FPS
97%
Price, $
$275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
