In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i7-8700T is slightly slower than the Core i3-3220T and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $85 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Sep 03, 2012
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
Core i3-3220T
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 31% cheaper – $189.95 vs $275.00
- Up to 31% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.94 vs $1.57/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3220T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
175 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
87%
Price, $
$275
69%
Value, $/FPS
$1.57/FPS
60%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3220T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3220T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3220T
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3220T Sep 3rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
