In Atomfall, the Core i7-8700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-3217U. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 209 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Jun 01, 2012
- Is 5 years and 10 months newer
Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy – 17 vs 35 Watts
- Consumes up to 51% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3217U: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
209 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3217U in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3217U in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3217U
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3217U Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 17 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | unknown |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
