In Cyberpunk 2077, the Core i7-8700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-3210. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $99 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Up to 2% faster in Cyberpunk 2077 – 124 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Cyberpunk 2077
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Apr 02, 2018 vs Jan 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i3-3210
- Up to 38% cheaper – $159.00 vs $258.39
- Up to 38% cheaper
- Up to 38% better value in Cyberpunk 2077 – $1.30 vs $2.08/FPS
- Up to 38% better value in Cyberpunk 2077
Cyberpunk 2077 FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3210: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
124 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.39
61%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
62%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Average FPS
122 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
67 FPS
94%
Price, $
$159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3210 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-3210 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-3210
Jan 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-3210 Jan 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35W | Power Consumption | 55W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
