In Deathloop, the Core i7-8700T is same performance as the Core i3-10105. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $138 more expensive!
Core i7-8700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10105
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 02, 2018
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Up to 50% cheaper – $136.86 vs $275.00
- Up to 50% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Deathloop – $0.62 vs $1.25/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-10105: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$275
49%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
50%
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$136.86
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-10105 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700T vs Core i3-10105 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700T
Apr 2nd, 2018
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700T Apr 2nd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2018 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
