In Rust, the Core i7-8700 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $150 cheaper!
Core i7-8700
- Up to 52% cheaper – $137.66 vs $288.00
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 41% better value in Rust – $0.61 vs $1.03/FPS
- Up to 41% better value in Rust
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 25% faster in Rust – 278 vs 223 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-8700 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
223 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
59%
Price, $
$137.66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
47%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
59%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-8700 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-8700 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
87%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 5th, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$303.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
