In Atomfall, the Core i7-860 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2689. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-860
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 95 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer – Mar 06, 2012 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 2 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-860 vs Xeon E5-2689: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
188 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
98%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.69/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-860 vs Xeon E5-2689 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-860 vs Xeon E5-2689 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
96%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-860 Sep 8th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA2011 |
95W | Power Consumption | 115W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
