In Rust, the Core i7-860 is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $158 cheaper!
Core i7-860
- Up to 55% cheaper – $129.94 vs $288.00
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 40% better value in Rust – $0.62 vs $1.03/FPS
- Up to 40% better value in Rust
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 278 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 15 years and 3 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 15 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-860 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
209 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
41 FPS
46%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
45%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
60%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-860 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-860 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-860 Sep 8th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
