The Core i7-860 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-7920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-860
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-7920X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Core i7-860 vs Core i9-7920X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
167
90%
Min 1% FPS
112
91%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
185
100%
Min 1% FPS
123
100%
Price, $
$145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Core i7-860 vs Core i9-7920X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-860 vs Core i9-7920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-860 vs Core i9-7920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
48%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.46 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-860 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.3 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16.5 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |