In Atomfall, the Core i7-860 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $200 cheaper!
Core i7-860
- Up to 61% cheaper – $129.94 vs $329.95
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 55% better value in Atomfall – $0.68 vs $1.52/FPS
- Up to 55% better value in Atomfall
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-860 vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
189 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
87%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$329.95
39%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
45%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-860 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-860 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-860 Sep 8th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
