In Deathloop, the Core i7-860 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $33 more expensive!
Core i7-860
No clear advantages
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 14 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 25% cheaper – $96.99 vs $129.94
- Up to 25% cheaper
- Up to 28% better value in Deathloop – $0.42 vs $0.58/FPS
- Up to 28% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 39% less energy – 58 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 39% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-860 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
221 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
97%
Price, $
$129.94
74%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
72%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-860 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-860 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-860
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-860 Sep 8th, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 8th, 2009 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1156 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
