The Core i7-840QM is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 7900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-840QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 8 threads
Core i7-840QM vs Ryzen 9 7900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-840QM
Jun 20th, 2010
Average FPS
166
76%
Min 1% FPS
112
78%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, $
$405.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.86/FPS
100%
Core i7-840QM vs Ryzen 9 7900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-840QM vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-840QM vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-840QM
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
8 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.87 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
26%
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-840QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| $568.00 | MSRP | $429.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Raphael |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR5 @ 5200 MHz |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
