Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 3574 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 20% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-820QM - 116 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 12 vs 8 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-820QM | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |