The Core i7-820QM is a much slower gaming CPU than the Pentium G3258. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 45 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G3258
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-820QM vs Pentium G3258 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Average FPS
166
98%
Min 1% FPS
112
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Pentium G3258
Jun 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$119.01
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Core i7-820QM vs Pentium G3258 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-820QM vs Pentium G3258 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-820QM vs Pentium G3258 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.73 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
3.06 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Pentium G3258
Jun 2nd, 2014
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-820QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
$546.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Haswell |
45 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |