In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-7920HQ is slightly slower than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-7920HQ
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 243 vs 228 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part I
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-7920HQ vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7920HQ vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7920HQ vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7920HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7920HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $568.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1366 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
