In Deathloop, the Core i7-7920HQ is slightly slower than the Core i3-330M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-7920HQ
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i7-7920HQ vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
226 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7920HQ vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7920HQ vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7920HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7920HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| $568.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 45 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
