In Atomfall, the Core i7-7820X is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $60 more expensive!
Core i7-7820X
No clear advantages
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jun 26, 2017
- Is 6 years and 3 months newer
- Up to 12% cheaper – $429.99 vs $489.95
- Up to 12% cheaper
- Up to 25% better value in Atomfall – $1.73 vs $2.30/FPS
- Up to 25% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 125 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-7820X vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
213 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
85%
Price, $
$489.95
87%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
75%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7820X vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7820X vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
8-core
33%
L3 Cache
11 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7820X Jun 26th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
