Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7820X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7820X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2018 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7820X.
Advantages of Core i7-7820X
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $379.00 vs $538.85
- Up to 16% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900F - $1.61 vs $1.91 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-7820X - 282 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820X - 32 vs 16 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
235
83%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$379
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $379 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
282
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
84%
Price, $
$538.85
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $538.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7820X | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |