The Core i7-7820X is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10900F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $120.01 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-7820X
The Core i9-10900F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i9-10900F
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 32% cheaper – $258.99 vs $379.00
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Core i7-7820X vs Core i9-10900F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, $
$258.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.34/FPS
100%
Core i7-7820X vs Core i9-10900F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7820X vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7820X vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
11 MB
55%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-7820X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 GHz |
| 11 MB | L3 Cache | 20 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
