In Atomfall, the Core i7-7820X is slightly slower than the Core i7-12700F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $198 more expensive!
Core i7-7820X
No clear advantages
Core i7-12700F
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall – 234 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jun 26, 2017
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 45% cheaper – $244.99 vs $443.02
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall – $1.04 vs $2.07/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-7820X vs Core i7-12700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
213 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
91%
Price, $
$443.02
55%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
50%
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
175 FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7820X vs Core i7-12700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7820X vs Core i7-12700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7820X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
11 MB
44%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7820X Jun 26th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | $324.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
