In Rust, the Core i7-7820HQ is slightly faster than the Xeon E5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-7820HQ
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 220 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5640
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E5640: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7820HQ vs Xeon E5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7820HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7820HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $378.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1366 |
45W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
