In Atomfall, the Core i7-7800X is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $102 more expensive!
Core i7-7800X
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jun 26, 2017
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
- Up to 26% cheaper – $288.00 vs $389.95
- Up to 26% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall – $1.17 vs $1.85/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i7-7800X vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7800X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
210 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
85%
Price, $
$389.95
73%
Value, $/FPS
$1.85/FPS
63%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7800X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7800X vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7800X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
8.25 MB
28%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7800X Jun 26th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| $383.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
