In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-7800X is slightly slower than the Core i3-12300T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-7800X
No clear advantages
Core i3-12300T
- Up to 11% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 112 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer – Jan 14, 2022 vs Jun 26, 2017
- Is 4 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 35 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-7800X vs Core i3-12300T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7800X
Jun 26th, 2017
Average FPS
101 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
75 FPS
89%
Price, $
$389.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.86/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7800X vs Core i3-12300T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7800X vs Core i3-12300T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7800X
Jun 26th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8.25 MB
69%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i3-12300T
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
66%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7800X Jun 26th, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12300T Jan 14th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 26th, 2017 | Released | Jan 14th, 2022 |
| $383.00 | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA2066 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 140 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
