In Control, the Core i7-7700T is slightly faster than the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-7700T
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 248 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5645
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$326.08
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core [4 Core] 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B07D9KVGTL.jpg)
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7700T vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7700T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
