Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Core i7-7700T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $121.47 vs $899.99
- Up to 86% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-13400F - $0.77 vs $5.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-7700T - 165 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
157
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, $
$121.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $121.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.45/FPS
14%
Price, $
$899.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 181 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7700T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |