In Rust, the Core i7-7700T is slightly faster than the Core i3-330M. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $227 more expensive!
Core i7-7700T
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 220 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Core i3-330M
- Up to 70% cheaper – $98.95 vs $326.08
- Up to 70% cheaper
- Up to 68% better value in Rust – $0.47 vs $1.48/FPS
- Up to 68% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i7-7700T vs Core i3-330M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
220 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
100%
Price, $
$326.08
30%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
32%
![Intel Core i7 i7-7700T Quad-core [4 Core] 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B07D9KVGTL.jpg)
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
209 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
39 FPS
78%
Price, $
$98.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7700T vs Core i3-330M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7700T vs Core i3-330M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7700T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i3-330M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.133 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7700T Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-330M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| HD 630 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
