Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700K.
Advantages of Core i7-7700K
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $173.17 vs $899.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-13400F - $0.91 vs $4.69 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-7700K - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
190
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$173.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $173.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.69/FPS
19%
Price, $
$899.99
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7700K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |