In Control, the Core i7-7700 is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $56 more expensive!
Core i7-7700
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 254 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 4 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 4 days newer
- Up to 17% cheaper – $269.00 vs $324.81
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 19% better value in Control – $1.05 vs $1.30/FPS
- Up to 19% better value in Control
Control FPS Calculator
Core i7-7700 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
248 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$324.81
82%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
81%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-7700 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-7700 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-7700
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
8 MB
27%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
79%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-7700 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
HD 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
