Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Core i7-7700
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $102.50 vs $485.00
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-14900F - $0.55 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-7700 - 223 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
187
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$102.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $102.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Buy for $485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-7700 | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |