In The Last of Us Part I, the Core i7-720QM is slightly faster than the Core i9-10900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-720QM
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part I – 248 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Last of Us Part I
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900F
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part I FPS Calculator
Core i7-720QM vs Core i9-10900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-720QM vs Core i9-10900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-720QM vs Core i9-10900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
6 MB
30%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
54%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
45%
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-720QM Sep 23rd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$364.00 | MSRP | $464.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
None | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
