The Core i7-720QM is a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-875K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-720QM
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i7-875K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-875K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Average FPS
164
98%
Min 1% FPS
111
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Average FPS
168
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, $
$174.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-875K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-875K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-720QM vs Core i7-875K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i7-875K
May 30th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-720QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
$364.00 | MSRP | $353.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Lynnfield |
45 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
1.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
6 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
None | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |