The Core i7-720QM is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-2400S and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $273.47 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-720QM
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-2400S
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 94% cheaper – $16.48 vs $289.95
- A much better value for money for gaming
Core i7-720QM vs Core i5-2400S for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
193
100%
Min 1% FPS
95
100%
Price, $
$16.48
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Core i7-720QM vs Core i5-2400S in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-720QM vs Core i5-2400S in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-720QM vs Core i5-2400S in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Core i5-2400S
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-720QM | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| $364.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 6 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
