In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-720QM is slower than the Core i3-10100 and it's also a slightly worse value for money, as it's only $10 cheaper!
Core i7-720QM
- Up to 6% cheaper – $149.94 vs $159.99
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Core i3-10100
- Up to 21% faster in Battlefield 6 – 75 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 10 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 12% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.13 vs $2.41/FPS
- Up to 12% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-720QM vs Core i3-10100: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Average FPS
62 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
82%
Price, $
$149.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.41/FPS
88%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
75 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
100%
Price, $
$159.99
93%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-720QM vs Core i3-10100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-720QM vs Core i3-10100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-720QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.6 GHz
44%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
50%
Core i3-10100
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-720QM Sep 23rd, 2009 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10100 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $364.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1333 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| None | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
