Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2310 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Core i7-6950X
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 140 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-6950X - 115 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $495.36 vs $588.88
- Up to 26% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Core i7-6950X - $4.31 vs $5.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $588.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6782 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
115
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$495.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $495.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6781 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6950X | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |